![]() ![]() These interactions indicate that there is a very fine line between who is sane or insane and therapy or treatment from domination or control that is, if there were any lines to begin with. In both, we note the interactions between Nurse Ratched (Louise Fletcher) and the so-called “mentally unstable” inmates, headed by Randle McMurphy (Jack Nicholson). It is reminiscent of one of my favorite books and movie of the same title, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, written by Ken Kesey. Now you may well argue that people observe radioactive stuff all of the time, from medical technicians to particle physicists, from miners to manufacturers of munitions, and there is no change in rates of decay. Lastly, something else to contemplate: how would this have bearing on people who are so-called diagnosed as clinically insane are they or is it our perception of them? The 'Observer Effect' seems highly selective (2): It exists within the Quantum Zeno Effect but not otherwise. Is it any wonder why love is the only thing that is real or matters and is incorruptible or unassailable−and that releasing judgment and forgiving others (and our self) is so freeing? Denouncing those sides of our self that we don’t like is exactly why we will continue to draw in people or situations that we don’t like or want. Accepting the whole of what we are makes us whole. As human beings, we tend to be the judge and jury for the actions and behaviors of others, when perhaps, we should just remain observers.Īs an observer, we can learn a lot about our self, as what we are observing, is something we need to see about our self. Essentially, rather than pointing a finger at someone else, it’s holding a mirror up to oneself because what is being observed is YOU, it’s YOUR reality. It presents a strong argument in favor of not making judgments about people or things for any reason, because your observation or perception is not necessarily real and if it is at all real, it’s directed by you and about you, not them. Who is ultimately right and who is wrong and how is this decided? What is ultimately right and what is wrong and who decides this? If someone else observes the very same thing and even under the exact same conditions, their individual observation could create something else, in effect, a different reality to mine.įurther, we believe what we perceive, because we created it, even though it isn’t necessarily real! Moreover, whatever is the “ultimate” real or reality doesn’t exist, because it takes an observer to determine! The Observer Effect: what are some implications of how this might affect our day-to-day realities in mundane and more profound ways? Therefore, perceptions or realities are subject to change based on whoever is doing the observing and the intensity in which they observe.Įssentially, what this means is if I observe it, it will become my reality or what I believe to be real. This would imply that consciousness plays a role in our individual realities, which further suggests our collective consciousness as well. This occurs on a quantum level and applies to human and non-human observers alike (machines). Quantum theory regarding the Observer Effect indicates that a beam of electrons is affected by the act of being observed, further causing what is being observed to behave differently. The unusual advantage of experiment-like conditions for this study offers unique causal evidence that international actors can have direct, measurable effects on the level of election-day fraud and, by extension, on the democratization process.The Observer Effect − a Conscious Universe any expectations, beliefs, or personal preferences of a researcher that unintentionally influence his or her recordings during an observational study. Using data from the 2003 presidential elections in armenia, the article demonstrates that although observers may not eliminate election fraud, they can reduce election-day fraud at the polling stations they visit. This article examines the effects of international election observation as a prominent form of international involvement in domestic elections and exploits a natural experiment in order to test whether international observers reduce election fraud. In his best-known thought experiment, Schrdinger asked us to imagine a cat placed in a box with a radioactive atom that might or might not kill it in an hour. In physics, Erwin Schrdinger’s famous cat highlights the power of observation. Although scholars have documented several macrolevel relationships between international-level variables and movement toward democracy, there has been little attention paid to the microlevel effects of international involvement in the democratization process. The observer effect pops up in many scientific fields. By pressuring governments to hold democratic elections and by becoming directly involved in the electoral process through technical assistance and funding or as election monitors, international actors now play a visible role in domestic elections and other democratic processes throughout the developing world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |